CommentStreams:Ebf5a783e18aa3396d09f5b2ffbf24f2

Thank you for your work—it was very exciting to read, especially given its closeness to my research. I particularly appreciate how you start by highlighting the reconfiguration of the subject under surveillance and emphasizing the distinction between the panopticon, which watches everyone as a criminal, and AI surveillance, in which the majority is not explicitly targeted. This reminded me of Parisi and Terranova's text (Heat-Death, 2000) on the shift from discipline to control and third-wave cybernetics ideas developing this shift further.

Your last paragraph inspired me to imagine forms of unpredictability. This brought to mind Trisha Brown’s experiments. However, I wonder: do we by 'making normality more unpredictable' allow AI systems to absorb deviance into the framework of the 'normal'? And does it really undermine the very logic it relies on?