<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-GB">
	<id>https://ctp.cc.au.dk/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=CommentStreams%3A63a9cb41ca695ec7f845248fb1772b3c</id>
	<title>CommentStreams:63a9cb41ca695ec7f845248fb1772b3c - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://ctp.cc.au.dk/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=CommentStreams%3A63a9cb41ca695ec7f845248fb1772b3c"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ctp.cc.au.dk/w/index.php?title=CommentStreams:63a9cb41ca695ec7f845248fb1772b3c&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-05T18:57:39Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://ctp.cc.au.dk/w/index.php?title=CommentStreams:63a9cb41ca695ec7f845248fb1772b3c&amp;diff=312&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Ruben at 10:07, 28 January 2025</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ctp.cc.au.dk/w/index.php?title=CommentStreams:63a9cb41ca695ec7f845248fb1772b3c&amp;diff=312&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2025-01-28T10:07:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Hi Daria, Many thanks for reading the text and your thoughtful suggestions!&lt;br /&gt;
The work of Parisi and Terranova has been on my radar, but I&amp;#039;ve never read it yet, I&amp;#039;ll certainly look into it after your suggestion. It certainly do not want to suggest I&amp;#039;m the first to describe a shift away from the discipline. So your reference is certainly helpful to develop this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for your reference to Trisha Brown, I wasn&amp;#039;t familiar with her work. I like how you phrase it as &amp;quot;imagining unpredictability&amp;quot;, which is almost paradoxical. As Massumi argues, the moment you imagine it as a threat you open it for securitization (pre-emptive security). I have to think of the practices in which these algorithms are (to be) embedded, in which the false positive rate (precision) is an important factor in having a manageable system -- to not be flooded with false positives. Nevertheless, it is something I need to think about further. Thanks again!&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ruben</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>